Why great new products die between excited early fans and the careful mass market - and how to cross.
Technology enthusiasts, visionaries, pragmatists, conservatives, and skeptics. The pitch that wins one group can stall with the next.
Pragmatists, the early majority, will not buy without references from other pragmatists, but visionary fans do not count as proof. That catch-22 is the chasm.
Visionaries buy a breakthrough and tolerate bugs. Pragmatists buy a safe, proven improvement from an established company - and want no surprises.
Concentrate everything on one niche with a funded buyer, a compelling reason to buy, and no entrenched rival. One segment, won completely, beats a thin push everywhere.
They need the complete solution - integrations, training, support, partners - ready on day one. Visionaries will assemble the missing pieces themselves; pragmatists never will.
The rest of this summary — and the one thing to do this week — is in the PDF.
Download the free PDFThe big idea: technology products are adopted in a fixed order, described by Moore's Technology Adoption Life Cycle. Innovators (technology enthusiasts) come first, then early adopters (visionaries), then the early majority (pragmatists), the late majority (conservatives), and finally laggards (skeptics).
The standard marketing model treats this curve as a smooth ramp, where each group hands the next one its endorsement. Moore says that is an illusion: there are cracks between every group, and between visionaries and pragmatists the crack is a chasm. The two groups buy for opposite reasons - visionaries want a breakthrough and forgive rough edges, while pragmatists want proven, low-risk improvement and references from people exactly like them. Visionary praise does not persuade pragmatists, yet pragmatists will not move without references - so products stall and companies burn their cash in the gap. Segway and Motorola's Iridium satellite phone are his famous casualties.